Child Pornography

Morphed Image: Protected or Porn?

By |July 23rd, 2014|

The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a conviction based on “morphing” an image to include a minor’s face as depicting child pornography. The appeals court rejected the man’s arguments that federal pornography laws, as applied to the “morphed image,” were not unconstitutional under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. The “morphed image” was a couple having sex with a minor’s face superimposed over the adult female in the original image. If the man chooses to appeal, either the full Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals or the United States Supreme Court would have to reverse the decision.
[…]

Online Contact Form

NOTE: An asterisk (*) indicates REQUIRED information.

DISCLAIMER: The use of this form or the Internet for communication with Lapin Law Offices or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form. Please do not send any confidential information until such time as an attorney-client relationship has been established. Your personal information is necessary in order for Lapin Law Offices to do a conflict of interest check prior to responding.


Lapin Law Offices does not offer the following services regarding debt: financial planning; money management; debt consolidation; debt negotiation; credit counseling; or bankruptcy representation.