Arbitration Clauses

AMEX Changing the Rules: Arbitration Instead of Court

By |January 23rd, 2013|

By: Jeffrey Lapin

At least since October 2012, American Express (“AMEX”) has changed its Cardmember Agreement to permit it to select binding arbitration for consumer disputes. Before this change, cardmembers could select either arbitration or a trial by jury. Now, unless a cardholder opts-out, AMEX can require arbitration.
[…]

Read More

Arbitration Clauses Favor Companies Over Consumers

By |April 27th, 2012|

Approximately one year ago, the United States Supreme Court in AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, upheld forced arbitration clauses and prohibited consumers from pursuing many claims in class action lawsuits. A recent article finds that consumers are disadvantaged by forced arbitration clauses. Companies, not consumers, benefit when disputes are arbitrated rather than litigated and decided by a judge or jury. […]

Read More

Online Contact Form

NOTE: An asterisk (*) indicates REQUIRED information.

DISCLAIMER: The use of this form or the Internet for communication with Lapin Law Offices or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form. Please do not send any confidential information until such time as an attorney-client relationship has been established. Your personal information is necessary in order for Lapin Law Offices to do a conflict of interest check prior to responding.

Lapin Law Offices does not offer the following services regarding debt: financial planning; money management; debt consolidation; debt negotiation; credit counseling; or bankruptcy representation.